Stonehenge Unhenged
Our efforts had not done much on Stonehenge with geometry
because most of the stones are quite irregular and didn’t seem to be placed
with an easily identifiable precision.
But that all changed when the north pair of stones were discovered to be
exactly north of the center of the two outer circles. After completing the www.arkaim-geometry.blogspot.com
there was some good hints to apply to Stonehenge.
Surely people can’t think that all the effort that went into
Stonehenge was to be able to plant crops at the right time. Or that it was a place for contemplating the
spiritual world? Stonehenge is a
colossally important contribution to our modern civilization. We just have to
learn how to read the message and perhaps listen to what it has to say. The
study herein may be just the tip of the iceberg. If one thinks that is
impossible, go to www.newgrange-geometry.blogspot.com
.
The Google Earth Image above is typical of structures
already studied around the world. It
uses phi as a function of the basic unit of measurement and also phi as the
important azimuth.
The longer white line going from the Stonehenge Center out
to the northwest corner of the Heelstone is 261.80 feet in length(10 phi)^(2). The azimuth is phi x 25 = 40.45 degrees as
measured from east (marked in yellow).
The length of the yellow line is the latitude in feet at 51.178854 and
is due east and west.
The longitude of the center is -1.826170 which multiplied by
200 is 365.234 which is remarkably close to the tropical year. When the year of 365.25636 is used and
divided by -200 the longitude is -1.826282 and that is exactly at the head of
stone 14 that is shaped like a comet and appears to be dragging some
bluestones.
Using similar methods for the latitude, the longitude can be
traced back to a hydrogen wavelength of 1.215678 and since the actual
wavelength is a bell curve it is only by published standards that the most
intense wavelength is 1.215668 and second is 1.215674.
The summer solstice varies but is always between the
centerline and the northwest edge of the No.1 stone. The earth axial tilt
varies by 2.4 degrees and these stones have room for 2.52 degrees between the
axis and the No.1 stone. The vertical white line is due north and south to the
Stonehenge Center and is discussed in detail further below.
For now we need to discuss the unique methodology the layout
uses to calculate a precise latitude, since there is nothing in the structure
to indicate latitude. In order to maintain some type of precision, in the
balance of the diagram, the builders provided a very unique system for solving
for the latitude.
The image below is from Mathcad and shows how simple
conjugate ratios (a+b)/(a-b) are used with the latitude in two different
equations for solving for a common latitude.
The two most abundant hydrogen wavelengths as stated above are 1.215668
and 1.215674 as precisely as we currently use as standards.
The outer 1.215668 * (e-1=1.718281828) and x 25 to yield the
outside radius at 52.2215156…. in feet.
The astronomical unit look a like number is derived two
different ways with the same result, exactly.
Quantum mechanics method
[(1/4-1/81)*( 1/4-1/64)*( 1/4-1/49)*( 1/4-1/36)*(
1/4-1/25)*( 1/4-1/16)*2]^(1/2) *10^(10) =
149,597,985.58693
Earth
to sun distance in kilometers (2000 epoch)
= 149,598,022.951 about 37 km
difference which cannot be measured
Ancient Egyptian method
Some think 20.625 is ancient Egyptian cubit in inches. That divided by 12 gives 1.71875 feet which
is middle A on the piano when doubled 8 times to 440 cps.
(20625)^(1/2)
/ 96 = 1.4959798558693 obvious the same number as the quantum mechanics
number but derived a totally different method.
The number 96 =12 x 8 but is also (1-1/ 5^(2)) = .96 or times 100 = 96
and is a factor in a specific hydrogen wavelength.
This precise number is used in the Mathcad solution.
As mentioned in the Newgrange blog, the earth/sun distance
not only varies because of the eccentricity of the orbit, but also the average
varies over time. The model number used
here is close enough to see why somebody would use it as a model input.
These two radii are used in a conjugate ratio in the Mathcad
model image below. The two conjugate ratios are equal to a similar function of
the earth orbital period around the sun in the year 1900 and as defined by
scientific convention as 31,556,925.9746 seconds underlined in pink.
One can trace the common elements by the color of the
underlines. The latitude is provided at
51.178854 and is supported to lesser accuracy by Google Earth images. Using the ruler tool with the “line” option,
make a yellow line from any two points on the inside (more visible) of the
sarsen curve. Write down the length and
azimuth. Switch to the “path” option and
trace over the yellow line the beginning, mid-point and end point using the
length of the yellow line. Then go back
to the “line” option and draw a line perpendicular from the initial line
mid-point using the “path” option. The
azimuth will be 90 degrees from the first line azimuth.
Switch back to the path and draw the path plenty far SW of
the center along the mid-point perpendicular line. Repeat the process for a second chord on the
inner sarsen radius. Where the second
perpendicular to the chord intersects the first, is the center. Move the cursor over to that point and check
the latitude and longitude. It should be
exactly the numbers given in the model solution above.
The Anthony Johnson Book Image
In Wikipedia under “Stonehenge” you will find a serious
detailed map of Stonehenge as submitted by Anthony Johnson in his book “Solving
Stonehenge” published in about 2008 which I recently purchased from Amazon. The
following image is from my Autosketch software with the Anthony Johnson image
as a background. The lines, circles and
ellipses are very precise. The reader
just needs to decide if they fit or not.
The defining lines for the circle centers is the north solid
red line and the heavy red line is the phi x 25 azimuth measured up from due
east as mentioned above. The three
sarsens on the northwest marked in dark cyan are defined by a line from center
at an azimuth of square root of phi x 100 and the ensuing angle is 50/phi at
30.9018 degrees.
The primary new observation is that not all the sarsens that
are thought to be fallen were really ever stood up. The two large stones (12 at the bottom and 25
at the top) are connected by a thick red dashed line where both the azimuth and
length are a simple function of the square root of 3. The azimuth near south is
the square root of 3 times 100 = 173.205 + 180 going from south to north. That
number times 10/32 (32 is 2 raised to the fifth power, typical of ancient
efforts) is the length.
In ACAD all the lines are infinitely thin but are made
graphically thick here so they can be viewed more easily.
Stonehenge Center
The sarsen inner and outer circles were graphically fit to a
three point circle and that is how the north line to the top stone was
found. Later, the center was established
as defined by the north and phi based azimuth and redrawn as they are shown
now. They didn’t change much over a
fraction of an inch. Note there is
nothing of significance around the centers of those blue thinner circles.
The red ellipses were tried to be drawn using the circle
centers but nothing seemed to work. The
ellipses are centered about 5.63755 feet northeast of the circles center along
the axis. (see Newgrange for the source
of that number) The axes of the ellipses are along the 25 phi axis marked in
thick red. The ellipse aspect ratios are simple functions.
The dashed green marks the angle of ten sarsens at 115.1
degrees or times 10 = 1151 symbolic years.
This number is a key to understanding the basic purpose of
Stonehenge. This will be discussed much
further below.
The cyan dashed lines demonstrate that even the taper on the
sarsens might be indicating something.
One can see the lines are not only at an angle of significance but that
they intersect on Stone 16. Stone 16 is
shown on the Johnson image as it is at the base (where folks can measure
it). It tapers significantly at the top
so the intersection is actually quite precise at the higher elevation.
The details on the two north stones (26 & 127) is
provided below. Mr. Johnson labeled
these as “fallen sarsen” but it is argued here that they were never standing
and were designed to be a key to understanding Stonehenge geometry.
The Great Trilithon
Stones 55a and 55b are said by some to be fallen and broken
stones. Even Sir Petrie numbered them as
if a single stone. However, if so they very fortuitously fell in perfect
alignment of the northwest edges and at a 45 degree angle from both north and
east (shown in thick blue dashed).
Stone 56 has a button on top and stone 80 a hole on one end
so that is likely why some thought they were two stones to make the Great
Trilithon completing with stones 55a and 55b.
Stone 80 is far too north to have fallen into that position. If it fell, it had to have been moved,
perhaps to get it out of the way of what needed to happen to 55.
However, there is a big problem. The sum of the lengths of 55a and 55b is
about 25-26 ft . Stone 56 is sticking out about 22 feet so its total length has
to be around 30 feet since it is reportedly 8 feet into the ground. This is
checked by multiple photographs with known widths and with data listed in
Wikipedia and other sources.
It is not likely anyone would go to the trouble of making
55b so similar to 55a and then bury one end.
And there is no flat spot or button on either end of stones 55a and
55b. Some will argue stone specimen
thieves knocked them off. But then too
the gap between stones 55a and 55b is not representative of a clean break. All the edges have been dressed and rounded
off systematically and not done only by people seeking souvenirs.
Even back in Sir Petrie’s time, it was thought that stones
55a and 55b were once a single stone and broke when it fell over. There is very good evidence that was not the
case. The gap between the stones has a minimum distance of about 5 inches and
therefore that is as big as the gap could have ever been. When one falls a tree, the butt of the tree
is almost always away from the stump about a butt diameter due to the angular
momentum the center of gravity develops as it free falls once cut.
A stone that was buried into the ground even 4 feet would
not generate such an angular momentum and would not move similar to the tree
falling. There is nearly nothing that could make the stone move in the opposite
direction to the southwest. Stone 56 is
now erected over seven feet NE of the SW tip of stone 55a. If stone 80 fell
first and then stone 55 fell against it and broke, stones 55a and 55b would
have a random arrangement. The SW edges
of the two stones are in alignment and at an azimuth of 45 degrees from either
north or east.
The conditions of the surfaces of stones 55a and 55b are
very different. Stone 55a has a hewn
sloping taper almost its full length and very flat as if formed and not broken
on a natural crack. Stone 55b has
natural holes in the top surface which is generally flat and not tapered. The
NE end of stone 55b shows serious impregnation of alternative stone material in
the curved section which is at a precise 4 foot radius. This does not sound like it was shaped by
malicious stone specimen stealers. The
gap between the stones is rounded in two directions and in accordance with
similar geometric radii. It is not
likely that stone stealers reached way down in the gap to get their treasures
when there was plenty of much easier material.
The positions of stone 55a and 55b are perfect to be lifted
above the center of gravity and place the NE corner of stone 55b in the ground,
perhaps in a shallow hole. It could be
that stone 56 was already erected and could have served at the mast to lift
stone 55-55b. As they attempted to raise
55a+55b, they broke immediately and were set back down in their initial
position.
In the diagram below, an attempt is made to reconstruct a
standing column from the two pieces of stone 55. One can see that it would have been a very
peculiar looking column and not nearly buried in the ground far enough to keep
it standing. Not only is the buried
section narrow, but it also is curved and would provide little resistance to
even wind, let alone earthquakes from the nearby fault lines.
The thickness at ground level is only 1.3 feet and the depth
into the ground is four feet while most of the mass reaches up to 22 feet. It
would be very top heavy. The curved arc on stone 55b is rotated in the red
image so one can see it. The two stones are very nearly the same in plan view
lying on the ground as discussed earlier. The top end of stone 55a and all of stone
55b is well over 3 feet in thickness while stone 56 is barely over 2 feet in
thickness. This is not something we see
a lot of in the other trilithons at Stonehenge.
The image below of the stones 55a and 55b shows a magenta
thick line from the southwest tip to the northeast tip. The line is at an azimuth of 51.178854
(latitude of Stonehenge Center) and at a length exactly 2.5/(.3048^2)
=26.90977 feet. The reader must decide
if it fits or not.
It is very likely stones 55a and 55b were repositioned in
their current location and perhaps represent Constellation Lepus or something
else like it. The two stones are positioned where a single stone would have
been placed in order to have been raised up vertical and be in line with the
other pillar stone. The right end of 55b would have been set into the ground
and been much more stable. It could be that 55b was planned to be set shallow
to purposefully allow it to vibrate.
Stone 26 and stone 127 are shown below and some of the
geometry that seems to fit these stones quite well.
If the reader does not want to dig into the geometry and
mathematics, just look at how the circles and lines fit together and fit the
image so well. However, it is the
interconnecting geometry that makes the case for a design criteria.
After having established an approximate center for the outer
large stones, it was noted that the right side of stone127 above was located
pretty close to 90 degrees on ACAD where 90 is due north. Then it was noticed that the second side was
parallel and also oriented due north.
Then it was noticed that the bottom curve fit a circle and the top
looked like an involute curve. These
curves were never buried in the ground.
Then the left stone seemed to have two circular curved sections.
The overall mathematics is likely far above the interest of
most readers and so only the simple relationships are discussed at this time
Key to gaining confidence in the geometry is the multiple uses
of certain numbers. For example, the red
dashed circle at the left is at a radius of square root of 6 feet with high
precision. The distance on the right
from the center of the bottom green dashed circle to the center of the blue
dashed circle as part of the involute is exactly 6 feet. There is repeated use
of 6 in relationships.
Even the azimuths of various lines are a function of
well-known numbers we use such as square root of 10, 365.25636 the sidereal
days in the year and the perpetual occurring number 1.718281828 as the
meaningful part of natural log base 2.718281828.
There will be readers, perhaps archeological professors,
which will be internally hemorrhaging over the idea of complex mathematics a
few thousand years BCA. Perhaps for them
it might be an easier pill to swallow that the ancients really didn’t know what
they were doing but were only reacting to feelings maybe developed
spiritually. But the numbers are there
and in multiple redundancies. (see the blog on King Chamber at end)
For the average reader, here is where this argument is
going. Stonehenge is similar to Arkaim
in Russia and deals with the Great Comet of 1680 which is not a typical comet
but is a very dangerous dark star with a mass several times that of earth. This is likely the ninth planet Cal Tech
folks are looking for and described by Sitchin and discussed in the Sumerian
blog reference at the end of this blog.
One must keep in mind that any practical scale model of our
solar system is impossible to draw on paper any size less than many football
fields. Therefore, certain “representations”
are necessary to give the viewer the “idea” but are not necessarily all that
representative on a scaled basis. Likewise, we do not have any “collapsed star
materials” which are densities of tons per cubic centimeter, but we do theorize
that the makeup is of neutrons, protons or an absence of electrons. We think
the material is highly crystalline in nature.
Guess what bluestone is?
It is highly crystalline dolerite and a good article exists on Wikipedia
under “bluestone”. If one were to want
to create a model, the general solar system consisting of the Oort Cloud ,
Kuiper Belt and planets with sun are thought to be the main contributions to
mass. We are only beginning to see the
Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud is largely still a theory, although the Voyagers
are shedding more light as we speak. Mainstream science in the days of Titius
and Bode were trying to resist the proclamations of the church that God created
the planets and sun. Even though the
Titius-Bode Law accurately predicts 8 planet bodies, because two, Neptune and
Pluto, were off, they threw out the whole idea and refused telescope time to
anyone wanting to research it. Now we
know that Neptune and Pluto are very much impacted by the Kuiper Belt and the
Law is significant….but…due to magnetics, not by God (see blogs at end)
The theory offered herein is that the stones we see are
largely what existed ever. The large
stones “imply” a circle but never were a complete circle. These stones are something that somebody
might stick in a rock garden but are not shaped for building a house or
anything useful. People have dug holes looking for missing stones and have
caused others to think the holes were in fact the place where other stones
existed in some cases.
Who could believe that the alignment with the summer
solstice was of any great importance?
The fact is that June 18th was the date given for Comet 1680
perihelion and is near the solstice of June 19- 21st and is the time
of year the Comet 1680 returns over the top and bottom of earth when earth is
on the approaching side of the comet to the sun, unlike 1680 December 18th
when earth was safely tucked away on the far side of the sun. That meant that
the closest Comet 1680 came to earth at that time was around 140,000,000
kilometers. When earth is on the
approaching side, the Comet 1680 has to be much closer depending on the timing
of earth’s orbit and the details of the comet path. (see blog on Newgrange
listed at end)
Therefore, what is important is every other passing or a
period of 1151 years. Comet 1680 would not be very visible at the Summer
Solstice. Traveling at perhaps over a
million miles per hour it would not look like a comet but just a streak in the
sky. In the summer, the daylight is much
longer and the total time to observe the comet would be hours to days and not
weeks or months as it was in 1680.
What might happen when a large body comes near to water
dominated planet earth? Fortunately, the speed is so high that about the time
the comet has some influence, it goes by and only nudges earth a little. But it could, and does, deform the crust on
occasion which would make the near side of earth bulge toward the comet and the
far side sink such that Mt. Ararat could be below sea level for a short period.
One can imagine the earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis that would result. And
the tectonic plate in the near east is quite small being smothered between two
much larger plates which could account for a more serious crustal deformation.
A three mile distortion in 8000 miles is almost not significant. The difference
in earth radius between the equator and poles is about 13.7 miles and that is
due only to rotational forces.
There is good evidence to support the idea that Comet 1680
is the actual cause of the axis tilt and the resulting solstice dates. There
are two observations made in the last appearance in 1680-1681 that rule the
debate. First one was that the comet was a sun grazing comet and so bright it could
be seen in daylight. The second was they
initially thought there were two comets but only later decided in was the same
comet coming and then going. Paintings
repeatedly show the comet with the tail pointing away from the sun just before
sunrise and at a steeper angle than the JPL Horizon program shows it at 60
degrees. For observers to be certain of the two observations above, the comet
approach had to be fairly near parallel to the earth-sun axis at solstice.
Contact was made with Alan Chamberlin at JPL Horizon website
manager regarding the accuracy of the Horizon data for Comet 1680. He indicated that the late Dr. Marsden had
introduced the data from work done by Encke over 100 years after the Comet 1680
had appeared and there was no easy way to check on the data accuracy.
The data below is from Wikipedia article “axial tilt” or
obliquity. The chart was carefully
measured in ACAD and the half cycles put into Excel and found that the overall
average of the cycle periods was 78.98 x 575.5 years = 45,453 years. Even more convincing of a relationship was the
“time of reversal” which was 3 x 1151 years whereby the greatest influence on
earth is on 1151 years cycle. The
The slope of the lines determines how much maximum tilt
there will be since the period of the cycle remains pretty close to
constant. The total of 14 half cycles
from 500,000 to 750,000 years is only 229 years longer than the total of the
first 14 half cycles. It appears that
Comet 1680 stays on a pretty tight schedule and if the earth tilting angular
velocity is slower, then it doesn’t get as far as other cycles where the
angular velocity is greater.
Since the motion is always in the range where earth north
pole is tilted toward the sun at least 22.4 degrees, there must be something
about the earth and Comet 1680 that has more to do with the North Pole. While the South Pole has Antarctica as a land
mass, the north pole has all the top of Russia, Canada and Greenland. And the ice would have a role to play as the
ice ages have a cycle of about 25,000 years too. When the ice age and Comet 1680 are in
synchronization then there may be more angular momentum transferred to the
axial tilt.
There just isn’t anything inside the earth that can make
such a sudden reversal on such a rhythmic pattern. Computer models also don’t show anything in
the planet orbits that would allow them to collect on one side of the earth and
then 20,000 years later on the other side.
Besides, the gravimetric force of the planets and sun are in the same
plane as the earth and so they cannot cause such a rhythmic pattern.
Stonehenge is designed to call attention to the axial tilt
and uses multiples of phi to find the precision of the layout. The solstice is just a spinoff of this
arrangement. Something that is maybe 70% of the mass of the sun and the diameter
of the earth would offer a major gravimetric pull for the short time it passes
near the earth every other time at 1151 years.
Due to the rotation of the earth, different areas on earth would be
impacted at each passing. Since the
earth surface is primarily water, many events might have gone unnoticed in the
relatively unpopulated earth a few thousand years ago. But that would explain why there were so many
tales of floods and yet the entire earth didn’t flood at one time and kill off
all the animal and plant life, which is an argument mainstream science uses
against the Bible enthusiasts.
For this speculation to hold water there has to be some
serious evidence at Stonehenge. But
armed with the data from the Russian site Arkaim, it might be easier. The
diagram below expands on the Anthony Johnson images earlier.
At the right the dashed green are repeated to show the 115.1
x 10 = 1151 cycle of the June 18th cycle. The bottom dark magenta is measured
counter-clockwise from the bottom dashed green.
The top one is measured clockwise from the top dashed green. Both lines
find something significant. The bottom
finds stone 37 and the dark red dashed line intersects right at stone 37. The top finds the center of the curved
portion of stone 22. This redundancy
facilitates finding a system.
(copy this image and zoom it up in your photograph software)
Stone 15 marked with red and green dashed circles is right
on the ellipses of the inner sarsens often called the horseshoe. Note the ellipse is centered very near the
center of the bluestone orbit marked in dark solid red. The precise drawing uses the earth equator
radius in feet with the decimal shifted appropriately. The green dashed circle uses the distance
from earth to the moon in miles with the decimal shifted. The speculation here is that the horseshoe
sarsens indicate near earth passing comets coming from the Oort Cloud or Kuiper
Belt and in a large sense dragged here occasionally by Comet 1680.
Stone 14 actually looks like a comet and at its base are
three bluestones 38, 39 and 40 perhaps suggesting the dragging nature of such a
large massive body. The dark solid red ellipse is drawn to include as many bluestones
as possible in either a grazing arrangement or thru the center. The axis of the ellipse in on the Stonehenge
axis of 25 phi = 40.45 degrees up from east.
This preliminary posting will continue the quest to find
meaning in the remaining stones. My
special thanks to http://www.stonesofstonehenge.org.uk/p/missing-stones.html
for the detail photos of the Stonehenge stones.
My special thanks to Anthony Johnson for his book Solving
Stonehenge and in particular the image used in the background of ACAD analysis.
The Following is a
second posting regarding the “pickaxe marks” found in a 3D scan.
The image below is from snipview.com and is a 3 D scan done
by York Archeological Trust for English Heritage. This image was photographically treated to
enhance the marks and imported into ACAD to see if there was any order to the
so-called pickaxe marks. The general
interpretation has been these were marks made of the builder’s tools used to
erect the Stonehenge arrangement.
If one does a search on Bing.com using “Stonehenge 3D scan”
the images are shown.
The image below is from ACAD which initially appeared to be
a very precise 30-110-40 triangle. The
three point circle function was used to find features such as the pointed end
of the axe, curvature of the axe head and the bottom mid-point of the handle.
The three point function was then again used to connect the
circles and complete the yellow triangle with the perpendicular line to divide
it into a 30-60-90 triangle on the left and a 40-50-90 triangle on the
right. This alone indicates that there
is something special about these images.
Below in color is an initial rendering of the triangle using
dimensionless ratios such as the radii of the circles and lengths of the legs. With seven measurements there are 7x6/(1x2) =
21 direct dimensionless ratios and many more using conjugate ratios. One can
see that this initial image is very close to the final solution found in
Mathcad and provided in black type at the left of the image below.
The cyan hypotenuse type leg is “c”. The top near horizontal red leg is “a” and
the remaining red leg is “b”.
The Mathcad solution only changed the 40 degrees to
40.004328 and the 110.0022284 to 109.99627.
The 29.99777 increased ever so slightly to 29.9994. This all resulted
from finding that the square root of (sqrt)(c/a)x 5 gave the perimeter quite
precisely. Then it was noted that (b/a) = 7/9.
Then totally an accident it was found while calculating angles with the
law of cosines that a^(2) – b^(2) – c^(2) =
-10/sqrt (e) where “e” is the natural log base 2.718281828 or -6.065306596.
Just because you have three equations and three unknowns is
no guarantee that a mathematical solution exists, but in this case there was.
The direct solution was too complex for Mathcad to print in standard format, so
I used the MinErr function to approximate the solution and kept substituting
the answers back into the initial estimate until it quit changing. This provides
a 14 digit solution with a format that can be easily understood. The direct
solution is still being evaluated in matrix format.
This is just one of several examples where the pickaxe
symbols seem to be far more orderly than one might think by first glance. There are symbols in a row of three and other
relationships not so obvious. It is
likely these function more like “place markers in ACAD”.
Whether the builders put these marks on the stones or
somebody else did in more recent times will only be solved when the stones are
dated by muon analysis or some other dating process. Whoever put the marks
there was mathematically astute.
Knowhow at3 ctcweb dot3 net
Jim Branson
Retired Professional Engineering Manager
Continued Research in 2019
It is the speculation of this report that Stonehenge is far
too complex to be simply some type of calendar or worship center. Stonehenge actually does something…maybe
something really important to the benefit of earth modern mankind. Mainstream science tends to argue that if
aliens built Stonehenge, there should be some sign of high technology such as
laser carving. But just as would happen
to me if I went on a mission to Africa to assist deep state natives in learning
how to find water and dig wells, no computers, gps or encyclopedias would do
much good as that technology is too far ahead of the natives. The time we have
spent arguing about how the heavy stones were transported is likely a total
waste of time since the movement can be done quite simply with very simple
technology perfectly appropriate to the times thought to be of the construction
era.
The image below comes from Egypt and shows the movement of a
very heavy statue of apparently somebody like Isis. It is much heavier than the
sarsen stones. Circled in red is a man pouring something black onto the
skid. Shown in green are men apparently
carrying a plank from the back to the front.
Shown in blue are people perhaps carrying vessels of lubricant to be added
to the skids. Rather than skidding or rolling on the wet sand, it is likely
that a series of six planks (three per side) were used to make a perpetual
runway for the heavy load. The
coefficient of friction for lubricated wet wood sliding on similarly wetted
wood rails would be very low compared to using round logs rolling on the desert
sands.
The petroleum seeps around the earth are quite widespread
and were known to be used even in Neanderthal era. There would be no reason to believe that the
builders of Stonehenge were not thoroughly familiar with that black liquid as a
lubricant. There are also animal fat soaps that might be just as good but
likely not colored black.
Although the exact sources of all the major stones at
Stonehenge are not really known, all the possible locations are known. None of the sources are located in such a place
that a fairly good pathway to the Stonehenge area would be neither steeply uphill
nor steeply downhill. In the case of the much smaller bluestones, their
starting altitude might be as much as 1000 feet higher. The areas just north of Stonehenge which
likely sourced the huge sarsens are only a few hundred feet higher than
Stonehenge.
Without going into too much technical discussion, a 25 ton
block at a 3 degree angle has a gravity push of 1.3 tons. If the coefficient of friction of the greased
timbers is 0.1 then it would have a resistance of 2.5 tons. That would make the force necessary to move
it gently downhill about 1.2 tons or 2400 pounds, easily contributed by a few
dozen people. Much of the distance from Wales to Stonehenge would be steeper
than 3 degrees (about a Hiway slope) so the workers might need to hold the
stone back or use wedges for braking.
The scheme for lifting the huge stones up high enough to
slide down into a prepared ditch is shown below. The stone is jacked up using small pieces
near the centerline of the stone shown in red.
When a larger bridging beam will fit, it can be inserted and the process
repeated until the desired height is reached. The elongated stones just about
raise themselves.
Stone 56 has a precise curvature along one wide upper face
and then a related curvature on top. Using the known width from the Johnson
image, the radius appeared to be about 18.62+ feet in radius. In trying to find meaning for that, the
radius was doubled and taken times pi to find the circumference. That turned out to be near 1.60217662^(1/3),
so that value was temporarily used at 18.62331239. Then it was noted the top surface had a
radius just over 0.99 and dividing that into 18.62 for a dimensionless ratio
gave the number which when made negative and taken to power of ten yielded a
number very close to the basic charge including the 10^(-19). The
top radius was set to 0.99085 and the dimensionless ratio was made -18.79528961
and that gave 1.60217662 x 10^(-19), the basic unit of charge. These
two uses of basic charge suggest to me stone 56 is designed to do something involving
electricity.
It was noted there were
3 equations all using only the basic charge number of 1.602176xxx. A Mathcad model solution was set up and is
shown in the image below.
The Mathcad symbolic
exact solution was a complex equation.
The MinErr function returned a value between some of the Codata values
occurring between 1986 and 2014. The
Codata values always have a standard variation of 2 to 4 x 10^(-8) suggesting
the value is only good to eight digits.
In substituting a pretty wide variation for the Mathcad “suggested
input”, the output in MinErr only changes in digits beyond the 11th
digit.
If the reader is
interested in some additional details, take a look at the next image. Otherwise, just skim over it.
In contact with the folks who generate the Codata (NIST)
list of universal constants, their method of establishing “their best estimate”
involves more of a history of laboratory data and multiple research efforts
involving multiple constants. Perhaps
the Stonehenge design seeks to give us a model number that won’t vary so
much. Our measurement of the
gravitational constant often varies in the 5th digit routinely. Intelligence trying to give us a heads up on
technical development would likely want to use a number more constant than
that. A further discussion of the electric charge constant can be seen at the
King Chamber blog listed at the end of this blog.
A green line drawn from the center of the top circle down to
a perpendicular line at the bottom of the curvature is the dimensionless ratio
of 5 / 2.0618 where the latter is in the neighborhood of the Egyptian cubit as
used in defining the earth/sun distance for models. (King Chamber blog)
The number (2.0618 / 1.6021766 * 20)^(1/6) =
1.71828167 which seems to be another relationship involving charge and (e -1) =
1.718281828.
Stone 56 is not only higher than anything else, it is much
smoother and obviously some type of interface between Stonehenge and something
else.
Trilithon Orderly Amplification
Now since the faces of the trilithons are not prepared
smooth and precise enough to reflect acoustic or electromagnetic waves reliably,
what if the trilithons are really more like grids in the old vacuum tubes and
change the direction of charged ions due to the charge on the trilithons which
may come from Comet 1680 as it approaches earth on the 1151 year cycle (double
575.5).
The fundamental theory of this effort is that Stonehenge was
designed to perform some function when Comet 1680 returns in the summer time
around June 18th and at a time when earth is potentially positioned
to pass thru the tail of the comet. Obviously, Comet 1680 has made passes near
earth for millennia and it doesn’t always cause much damage, but it looks like
it could in 2256 and 3407 AD. If stone 55 broke while trying to hoist it into
place with the south end of stone 55a on top, then a Plan B might be to carve
the two pieces into something that would give us a hint at what needs to happen
next. Stonehenge may still be partially unfinished.
It appears that stone 55 with the south end of 55a on top
and the thick north end of 55b in the ground could act like some type of grid
that could alter the electric field around stone 56. This combination could act like a record
player needle and stone 80 anchored on stone 16 would allow a connection
between solid earth and incoming ionic pulses.
The new stone 55 would be able to pivot minutely in the soil due to the
curved bottom end.
The only people who now understand electronics are those
that study solid state devices which deeply hide what is happening unless you
know the theory. The old vacuum tubes
were often transparent and one could see if they were burnt out or if the grid
wires were broken. The tube testers were
available to the common man even at grocery stores and thereby introduced some
of the theory to the layman by experience. In examining some of the tubes in
Wikipedia under “vacuum tubes” I see combinations of grids that could be a
relative of the trilithons. This approach seems to address how you can use the
relatively imprecise trilithons in a precise electrostatic operation.
The image below attempts to show one possible scenario of
something similar to acoustic feedback.
One doesn’t hear it so much anymore because the people who set up sound
systems are much more highly trained than decades ago. If the speakers are
placed fairly near the microphone, the system latches onto a dominant sound and
amplifies it over and over in a continuous loop until it reaches, usually a
loud high pitched squeal.
Anytime near the summer solstice of years 1151 measured from
1104, Comet 1680 is approaching earth headed toward the rising sun. This provides ample time for some focusing to
occur between anything being emitted from Comet 1680 and Stonehenge. Just as an
example, incoming waves parallel to the 40.45 red line axis are shown and their
reflections that gradually get to the stone 56 area. The cyan and green are shown to get
there. The blue and the black are
examples of waves that are shielded or just don’t have the right angle at that
time. The angle of Comet 1680 to the
earth-sun axis likely is changing slightly as it approaches.
It is likely we do not have technology capable of even
sensing the output. However, anything
like a galactic federation may be monitoring the output and can use the data to
project how serious the influence will be.
They would not want to organize an aids group unless something big is
going to happen as it did in 8104 BC when Noah was building his Ark which now likely
is sitting atop Mt. Ararat in Iran.
It is thought by many that there may not be much that can be
done to alter the course of the huge Comet 1680 and it may not be difficult to
make things much worse. However, many
productive actions could be taken to preserve our civilization such that the
surviving people can rebuild quickly and perhaps reach a sophisticated
civilization capable of dealing with the Comet 1680. With 7 billion people, some are bound to
survive most events.
All the people alive now will be long dead before 2256 and
since there are humans all over the universe, preserving our particular brand
may not be that important in the long run.
However, it will be very important to the people alive in 2256. These distant relatives of ours will be
mighty grateful if we can do something that helps.
Bluestone Groups
Most scholars think the builders were intrigued by the
apparent characteristics of the bluestones.
The image below highlights the analysis of the positioning of the
bluestone groups which at first glance appear to be almost randomly placed
inside Stonehenge. The analysis appears
to show that the bluestones were selected for very important reasons.
The angles were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and many
types of relationships such as dimensionless ratios and sums of ratios were
checked for some type of mathematical relation.
Two such relationships are shown below.
Clearly the sine and cosine functions point to some type of
order that should not be there if these are purely random numbers. These relationships were incentives to look a
little deeper into the potential reasons for the particular angles used in the
placement of the bluestones.
The image below shows the Mathcad solution which was found
with very high statistical relationship to the initial data and in a consistent
pattern suggesting it was done with purpose.
The initial measured angles are named c11 thru c15 and are
from the image above. Many of these relationships such as the first sum of c11
thru c14 matched the square root of 7 to 5 digits, far beyond what could be
repeatedly done on an individual basis.
But because the sum of four angles will have some high and some low, the
average can yield the suggestion of a more precise number.
The number 1.420405751683 is the hydrogen hyperfine
frequency used in multiple departments of astronomy. The natural log function of x^(1/x)
yields a maximum precisely at x= e= 2.718281828. The production of the hydrogen hyperfine
frequency is produced precisely at 2.06175529448 and again at 3.81606638573. The number 206.17 appears in the Great
Pyramid of Giza (see King Chamber blog).
The sum of c13 + c14 divided by 40 produces the second number to five
digits. The complete sum of angles of
course must be 360. The number 1.3125 is
the ratio of quantum numbers in the primary hydrogen wavelength series and is a
fundamental number as to how the universe we know is organized. The number 512 is 2 raised to the ninth
power. A greater discussion of these types of considerations is given in the
King Chamber blog listed at the end.
Just because there are five equations and five unknowns does
not mean there must be a mathematical solution.
The arrow in the “find” block indicates this is a “symbolic solution”
and is an exact solution.
To most readers, this is just a jumble of numbers with no
obvious meaning. However, it really
means that there is substantial probability that the bluestones were carefully
laid out and one should dig deeper to find the plan to communicate to us in
modern times.
The image below addresses both of these issues.
One can go to the website above to see the image without the
red dashed marks and see that the marks are placed with good precision. This is just one example of a tanzanite gem
stone. The bluestones of Stonehenge contain
numerous gem-like stones and it would require a substantial study to determine
if one exists that more perfectly matches the tanzanite. One can see in the upper right corner in red
that the angles are very similar to the original angles and also the mathematical
model angles.
In modern theories, mainstream archeologists tend to think
that the bluestones were used because the builders thought they contained
magical powers. It appears that theory
is not far off considering out modern limited ability to understand the
potential of Stonehenge. The analysis
above suggests there may be a much higher reason for using the bluestones.
The bluestones are made of a group of minerals called
plagioclase feldspar which is part of the family of tectosilicates which makes
up about 90% of the earth’s crust. The
Stonehenge sources may have been specially selected to perform certain
functions at certain locations. This
area of specialty is such a complex and poorly understood portion of mineralogy
that most readers would be daunted.
Readers with special interests can check out the various topics in
Wikipedia and read until their heart is content.
In rethinking the discussion on ionic particle flow thru the
trilithons, it makes sense that the bluestone groups could act as secondary
grids producing some type of amplification in a precisely controlled
electrostatic field.
Knowhow at1 ctcweb dot1 net
Jim Branson
Retired Professional Engineering Manager
See also
www.sumerian-va243-tablet.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment